Does fringe violence reflect the whole of the parties embraced by those who committed it?
Is there a line beyond which the amount of violence associated with a certain viewpoint is too great to countenance the acceptance of even the most peaceable of related ideals?
How should those in any group react to violence that supports some of their own beliefs, but which act itself they would strictly condemn?
The more we see violence, the more we condemn not only the violence but the viewpoint behind it. Yet few movements are immune from fringe elements. Where, then, might we turn?
Balance and unity in today’s fragmented world.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!