Wikipedia: "The measles vaccine is effective at preventing the disease"
Wikipedia: "Smallpox was eradicated by a massive international search for outbreaks, backed up with a vaccination program, starting in 1967."
Anti-vaxxers:

@orangesec_0 "Natural News is a conspiracy and pseudoscience website that routinely publishes false information." mediabiasfactcheck.com/natural

@orangesec_0 Only one of those links even points to a document related to vaccination, and that one that remains is a paranoid rant based on misinterpretation of data about the MMR vaccine.

@orangesec_0 Because it is taking the absolute figure of a few hundred people out of millions administered the vaccine and comparing it to zero deaths out of a much much smaller number of people exposed to the disease.

Cite a respectable paper in a reputable, peer-reviewed journal, or I will block you. If you complain about science being “censored” or studies being “repressed,” I will block you. If you cite another pseudoscience Web site, I will block you.

@orangesec_0 I wish to see actual evidence from a source that can be respected. That is not denialism. You have failed to provide that evidence. Do it now or I will block you. This is your last warning.

@alexbuzzbee I'll get blocked no matter what I do because you already made your mind up of what is true and what is not.

@orangesec_0 Your evasive response leads me to conclude that you are either unable or unwilling to find and present authoritative evidence supporting your position.

I will leave you with this paper, which finds that while vaccines can cause allergic reactions, which can be severe (and are almost certainly the source of the deaths reported by the government), they are rare and other commonly-claimed negative side effects are unsupported. nationalacademies.org/hmd/Repo

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Freespeech

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!